Entertainment Law Resources
​
  • HOME
  • LAW PRACTICE
    • Mark Litwak
    • Diana Budninskiy
    • Glenn Litwak
    • Pete Wilke
  • ARTICLES & VIDEO CLIPS
    • Articles >
      • General Articles by Mark Litwak >
        • Right of Privacy
        • Jimi Hendrix Right of Publicity Suit
        • Creative Accounting
        • The Hangover II: Tyson Tattoo Copyright Infringement Suit
        • Filmmaker's Bill of Rights
        • Purchasing Life Story Rights
        • Breaking Into Show Biz
        • Contract Law as a Remedy for Story Theft
        • Glossary of Industry Terms
        • Movie Merchandising
        • Internet Distribution - The Promise and the Pitfalls
        • Protecting Film Investors
        • Copyright Registration of Scripts & Films
        • Obtaining Music for a Motion Picture Soundtrack
        • Financing Motion Pictures
        • Protecting Your Stories
        • Documentary Filmmakers Adopt Position on Fair Use
        • Crowd-Funding for Filmmakers
        • New Law Will Help Indie Filmmakers Raise Financing
      • Film Articles by Mark Litwak >
        • Dealmaking Tips for Film and Television: The Acquisition/Distribution Agreement
        • The Film Distribution Deal: Tactics and Strategy
        • International Co-Production Checklist
        • Self-Defense for Filmmakers
        • Distribution and the Indie Filmmaker
        • Script Annotation Guide
        • Optioning Literary Material
        • Distribution 101: Foreign Sales Agent
      • Multimedia Articles by Mark Litwak >
        • Negotiating the Electronic Publishing Agreement
        • Publishing Agreement Checklist
        • Copyright Registration of Multimedia Works
        • Copyright Notice for Multimedia Works
        • Legal Roadmap for Multimedia Productions
      • Published Articles by Mark Litwak
      • Articles about Mark Litwak
    • Video & Audio Clips
  • STORE
  • RESOURCES
  • BLOG
  • CONTACT
  • FAQ
  • SITE MAP

Dancing Toddler Changes Copyright Law

9/17/2015

 
A recent Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals decision is good news for filmmakers who want to rely on the fair use doctrine to include materials in their own work without obtaining permission. Stephanie Lenz is a mom who posted a 29-second amateur video onto YouTube of her children dancing in her kitchen while the Prince song Let’s Go Crazy played in the background. The song was audible for about twenty seconds. Lenz did not attempt to obtain a license for use of the music.

 After Prince’s publisher, Universal Music Group, became aware of the video, it sent YouTube a takedown notice under the Digital Millennium Copyright Act (DMCA) claiming that the video infringed Prince’s copyright. YouTube removed the video and notified Lenz of its removal and the alleged infringement of Prince’s song. Lenz then sent YouTube a counter-notification, which included a statement made under penalty of perjury that she had a good faith belief that the material was mistakenly taken down. She claimed that the inclusion of the song in her video was a fair use and requested that it be reloaded onto You Tube. Under the fair use doctrine, one can draw upon copyrighted works to produce new works such as comment and criticism, parody, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research. For example, a movie or literary critic does not need to seek permission to include a small quote from a film being reviewed.

 YouTube reposted Lenz’s dancing baby video six weeks later. Several months later, Prince issued a statement threatening to sue several Internet service providers for copyright infringement as part of an effort to “to reclaim his art on the internet.” Universal then released a statement to ABC News regarding the removal of Lenz’s video that “Prince believes it is wrong for YouTube, or any other user-generated site, to appropriate his music without his consent…legally, he has the right to have his music removed. We support him and this important principle. That’s why, over the last few months, we have asked YouTube to remove thousands of different videos that use Prince’s music without his permission.”

The Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF) decided to contest the practice and filed suit against Universal arguing that takedown notices issued without considering whether a fair use exists is abusive and infringed Lenz’s rights of free speech. EFF argued that Universal acted in bad faith when they sent the takedown notice and they should have known that the video was not an infringing use.

 Under the DMCA, service providers like YouTube are not liable if they inadvertently allow infringing material to be posted on their sites. YouTube has more than 1 billion users and every minute 300 hours of programming is uploaded. It would be impossible for it to carefully review all material before allowing it to be uploaded. To avoid liability, YouTube only has to comply with the DMCA requirements, which include responding timely to takedown notices. However, if copyright owners misrepresent that material is infringing when it is not, they can be liable for damages including attorney fees and costs.  

 The court held that the DCMA requires copyright holders to consider fair use before sending a takedown notification, and that the failure to do so raises a triable issue as to whether the copyright holder formed a subjective good faith belief that the use was not authorized by law. Universal can be liable for damages if it knowingly misrepresented in the takedown notification that it had formed a good faith belief the video was not authorized by the law. The decision “sends a strong message that copyright law does not authorize thoughtless censorship of lawful speech,” said Lenz’s lawyer, Corynne McSherry of the Electronic Frontier Foundation in San Francisco.

 This case follows several other recent decisions which gave an expansive view of fair use doctrine. In Faulkner Literary Rights, LLC v. Sony Pictures Classics, Inc., the court held that Woody Allen’s inclusion of a short quote (“The past is not dead! Actually, it’s not even past”) from William Faulkner’s Requiem for a Nun in the film Midnight in Paris was a fair use. In Seltzer v. Green Day, Inc., Nos. 11-56573, 11-57160, 2013 U.S. App. LEXIS 16322 (9th Cir. Aug. 7, 2013) the Ninth Circuit held that the popular band Green Day’s unauthorized use of street artists’ work, as a video backdrop for its stage show did not violate the artists’ rights. 

View the video 


Read the full case 

Comments are closed.

    Archives

    March 2018
    January 2018
    December 2017
    August 2017
    April 2017
    March 2017
    January 2017
    December 2016
    November 2016
    May 2016
    April 2016
    March 2016
    February 2016
    January 2016
    November 2015
    October 2015
    September 2015
    August 2015
    July 2015
    May 2015
    April 2015
    March 2015
    December 2014
    November 2014
    July 2014
    May 2014
    April 2014
    March 2014
    January 2014
    November 2013
    October 2013
    September 2013
    August 2013
    July 2013
    June 2013
    May 2013
    March 2013
    February 2013
    December 2012
    November 2012
    October 2012
    September 2012
    August 2012
    May 2012
    April 2012
    February 2012
    December 2011
    October 2011
    September 2011
    July 2011
    June 2011
    April 2011
    February 2011
    January 2011
    December 2010
    November 2010
    October 2010
    September 2010
    July 2010
    June 2010
    May 2010
    February 2010
    December 2009
    November 2009
    October 2009
    September 2009
    July 2009
    June 2009
    January 2009

    For older posts, please visit The Litwak Blog.
    Join our Email Newsletter list
    Email Newsletter icon, E-mail Newsletter icon, Email List icon, E-mail List icon
    For Email Newsletters you can trust
Home
Law Practice
Store
Articles & Video Clips
Resources

Blog

Contact
FAQ
Site Map

LAW OFFICES OF
MARK LITWAK & ASSOCIATES

11766 Wilshire Boulevard
Suite 270
Los Angeles, California 90025
Phone: 310-859-9595
Fax: 310-859-0806

Follow us on
Join our Email Newsletter list
Email Newsletter icon, E-mail Newsletter icon, Email List icon, E-mail List icon
For Email Newsletters you can trust
© 2013, Mark Litwak. All Rights Reserved.│ Legal Disclaimer │ Terms of Use and Privacy Policy
✕